top of page

The 'Timur Ruby' necklace

247259-200.png
June 30, 1837
gold-medal-vector-816269_edited.png
subject-icon-1_edited.png
People
Untitled-2.png
Bahadur Shah II 1837–1857

IMAGES TITLE

IMG100030

DESCRIPTION

The 'Timur Ruby' necklace 1853 Spinels, diamonds, gold, enamel 50 cm long The spinels from the Lahore Treasury, 1849; presented to Queen Victoria by the Directors of the East India Company, 1851; the necklace made for Queen Victoria, 1853 (_220 5s. and _131 17s. 6d.; Garrards Royal Ledger, f. 31) and altered for Queen Mary (RA QEII/Garrard/Ledger 1901-11, p. 167) While the most celebrated gem from the Lahore Treasury, the Koh-i-n_r diamond, came directly to Queen Victoria from India in 1850, other significant jewels remained with the East India Company until the conclusion of the Great Exhibition, where they had been shown to considerable acclaim in the Indian section. In recognition of the Queen_s patronage of the Exhibition, the Directors of the Company presented her with a magnificent selection of stones, of which the _wonderful_ rubies _cabochons, unset, but pierced_ particularly struck her: _one is the largest in the world, therefore even more remarkable than the Koh-i-noor_. This, the so-called Timur Ruby, which weighs 352.5 carats, together with three smaller stones - all of which are actually spinels rather than rubies - were set by Garrards into a new necklace of Oriental inspiration in April 1853. In June of the same year the necklace was adapted so that the re-cut Koh-i-n_r could occasionally take the place of the Timur Ruby; and in 1858 three of the five pendant diamonds originally attached to the centre of the necklace were made detachable for alternative use, two as earrings and the central pendant (the Lahore Diamond) as the centre of the Coronation Necklace. The history of the stone, with its illustrious provenance from the Mughal Emperors Jahangir, Shah Jahan, Aurangzeb and Farrukhsiyar, and the Persian rulers Nadir Shah and Ahmad Shah, is partly recorded in inscriptions dating between 1612 and 1771 on the stone itself. The connection with the great Asian conqueror Timur (1336-1408), which arose from a misreading in the early twentieth century of one of the inscriptions, has recently been reconsidered, and it is now thought possible that Nadir Shah, who looted the stone from the imperial treasury in Delhi in February 1739, may have placed his inscription over an erased inscription proclaiming Timur_s ownership. Source : Royal Collections

Rate This BookDon’t love itNot greatGoodGreatLove itRate This Book

Your content has been submitted

Post Comment
Ratings & Review
Click To Close Comment Box
Click To Post Your Comment
Show Reviews

Ismail Mazari

average rating is null out of 5

Very good information.

MUGHAL IMAGES

The Mughal Images immediately took a much greater interest in realistic portraiture than was typical of Persian miniatures. Animals and plants were the main subject of many miniatures for albums and were more realistically depicted. To upload your images click here.

The
Mughal Library brings readers of our history and related subjects on one platform. our goal is to share knowledge between researchers and students in a friendly environment.


 

bottom of page