top of page

null

Filter

By Years
By Languages
By Subclass
By Era
A Persian genealogical manuscript (BnF, Département des Manuscrits, Persan 67) — an anonymous, undated copy written in nastaʿlīq (black/red ink; some headings in red). As a work, Muʿizz al-Ansāb is a genealogical compilation produced for the Timurid court/library under Shāhrukh (early 15th century).

Muizz al-Ansab fi Shajarat al-Ansab . . .

The Book of Masterpieces of the Great in the Travels of the Seas written by Muhammad Harb..Katib Chalabi, known as Haji Khalifa (1609 AD - 1656 AD) is one of the most famous Ottoman scholars. His writings were the prominent feature in the world of science, thought and culture in the seventeenth century. He is a historian A geographer, bibliographer, and owner of reformist thought in the political, social, and religious aspects as well.Hajji Khalifa was widely known in the Ottoman Empire and in Europe, and his fame in the Arab world continues to this day, as he wrote his books in the Arabic and Ottoman languages, and they were translated into many European languages His book “The Masterpiece of the Great in Asfar al-Bahar” was written in Turkish after the Crete campaign that began in 1055 AH / 1646 AD, and the subsequent campaigns. The author lived through these events, so he wanted to participate in reform and raise morale. So he put this book, which dealt with pictures from. Book Title: "The Grand Masterpiece in the Voyages of the Seas" Classification: By Haji Khalifa Research and Translation: Dr. Mohammed Harb - Dr. Tasneem Harb Number of Pages: 295 pages Number of Volumes: 18.5 volumes Book Size: 17 x 24 Number of Editions: First Edition Deposit Number: 2016 International Standard Book Number (ISBN): 278-977-978

The Grand Masterpiece in the Voyages of the Seas . . .

“Do not become sedentary, for sovereignty resides in those who practice the nomadic Türkmen way of life.” These are the reported words of Qara Uthman Yülük (d. 1435), the founder of the Aqqoyunlu Türkmen state in Eastern Anatolia.1 The similarity with the recommendations made seven centuries earlier in Mongolia to the Türk ruler Bilge Qaghan (d. 734) not to live in “permanent habitation places”, is striking.2 This invites us to consider the kind of relationship that could or should exist between the exercise of power and the way of life—a question that is particularly relevant with regard to the various dynasties of Turkic and Mongol origin that ruled large parts of Eurasia during the pre-modern period.By dealing with the issue of the location of rule in a context of Turkic and Mongol domination, this volume is at the intersection of four lines of research that have produced an extensive literature: first, studies on the topography of power, largely derived from the works of the German historical school on Raumordnung;3 second, urban studies, since the city is the presumed locus of power in the history of Eurasia;4 third, Inner Asian

Turko-Mongol Rulers Cities and City Life . . .

Timurids In Transition Turko Persian Politics And Acculturation In Medieval Iran ( Maria E. Subtelny) ( 2007) In the transliteration of Arabic and Persian words, I have adopted the system of the International Journal of Middle East Studies, with the exception of the Arabic letters the and dh, which I have rendered by means of  and  in transliterating Persian. In cases where Arabic phrases have been embedded in a Persian text, or where works written in Persian have purely Arabic titles, I have transliterated these according to the Persian system.

Timurids In Transition Turko Persian Politics And . . .

Title: Bahadur Shah's Diary This diary is a translation from Farsi to Urdu of the Ahsan Al Akhbar of Mumbai and the Siraj Al Akhbar of Delhi, which has been published in book form for many years, and several editions of it have been printed. It has been continuously published in the newspaper Manawi Delhi since December 1934. Now it is being published under the new name, Bahadur Shah's Diary. Correction: It is necessary to mention for the readers' information that while recording this book, I have corrected the past errors of this book. Therefore, not only the name of this book has changed but there have also been changes in its content and appearance. Verbal Diary: This diary covers the period from November 1844 to March 10, 1848. However, after that until 1857, the circumstances could not be known, and in some places, diaries of those years were not available. But from the royal family of Delhi, a verbal diary in Farsi language from 1849 to 1850 has been found, which is being translated, and it will be the 13th part of this date. And it will be published in book form.

BAHADUR SHAH KA ROZNAMCHA . . .

Geographically and historically Inner Asia is a confusing area which is much in need of interpretation. Svat Soucek’s book offers a short and accessible introduction to the history of the region. The narrative, which begins with the arrival of Islam, proceeds chrono-logically, charting the rise and fall of the changing dynasties, the Russian conquest of Central Asia and the fall of the Soviet Union.Dynastic tables and maps augment and elucidate the text. The contemporary focus rests on the seven countries which make up the core of present-day Eurasia, that is Uzbekistan, Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Sinkiang, and Mongolia.Since 1991, there has been renewed interest in these countries which has prompted considerable political, cultural, economic, and religious debate. While a vast and divergent literature has evolved in consequence, no short survey of the region has been attempted .Soucek’s history of Inner Asia promises to fill this gap and to become an indispensable source of information for anyone studying or visiting the area. Maps :- 1 Inner Asia: principal political units - Page viii 2 Kök Turkic Empire, ca. 622 - 52 3 Mongol Empire, ca. 1294 - 102 4 Timurid Empire - 124 5 Central Asia, ca. 1825 - 176 6 Central Asia under Tsarist Russia - 194 7 Sinkiang (Chinese Turkestan) - 264 8 Kazakhstan - 276 9 Kyrgyzstan - 277 10 Tajikistan - 278 11 Turkmenistan - 279 12 Uzbekistan - 280 13 Mongolia - 296

A HISTORY OF INNER ASIA . . .

Tamerlane moved like a whirlwind through Eurasia and left a name familiar throughout the world. The record of his campaigns is long and vivid. From 1382 to 1405 his great armies crisscrossed Eurasia from Delhi to Moscow, from the Tien Shan Mountains of Central Asia to the Taurus Mountains in Anatolia, conquering and reconquering, razing some cities, sparing others. His activity was relentless and unending. Throughout his life he kept his armies on the move - sometimes together, sometimes divided and dispersed throughout the countryside, but almost never at rest or at home. His fame spread quickly to Europe, where he remained for centuries a figure of romance and horror, while for those more intimately involved in his career his memory still remains green - whether as the destroyer of Middle Eastern cities, or as the last great representative of nomad power. Tamerlane is more correctly called by his Turkic name, Timor; the western version of his name comes from the Persian Timur-i lang, Temur the

The Rise and Rule of Tamerlane . . .

In the history of the Mughal era, after Aurangzeb Alamgir, the kings, both local and foreign, who became the center of literary individuals' memoirs, the last lamp of this dynasty is Bahadur Shah Zafar. The cultural aspect of governance, which was prevalent during the reign of these kings, has completely changed today, and we can understand its imaginative historical outline through historical books. But the reality is that in many places, there is a deliberate or inadvertent trial of erroneous statements. In my research for the accurate events of the War of Independence in 1857, many excerpts from contemporary diaries and newspapers came to my attention. Among them, there is a portrayal of Bahadur Shah Zafar's era that is free from historical inaccuracies and imaginative exaggerations.

Bahadur Shah Zafar Kay Shab o Roaz . . .

In the years between the death of the conqueror Amir Timur in 1405 to the death of his great-great-grandson Sultan-Husain Mirza in 1506 that comprised the "century of princes," the vast territory conquered by Timur, from Anatolia and Syria in the west to the Indus and Turkistan in the east, underwent many and varied political changes, shifts, conquests and reconquests. Timur's empire was weakened by the disunity of his successors, who fought constantly with each other, until gradually the western portions of the realm were lost to the Turcoman and the eastern and Central Asian portions fell to the Uzbeks. Ultimately central Iran and the heart of the empire, Khurasan, fell to the Safavids, and the Timurids lost power altogether. Throughout the period, however, in the midst of the political instability', the dominant Persian ate literary and artistic culture remained remarkably stable, firmly ensconced, un-challenged in its supremacy and unified in its development. The Turco-Iranian synthesis of Persian cultural hegemony and Turco-Mongolian political and military domination to which the Timurids fell heir had long been in the making and had held sway throughout the area of Iranian cultural influence since the fourteenth-century successors to Genghis Khan and the Mongolian invasion of the previous century. The successors to the Mongolian Ilkhans, short-lived dynasties conquered by Timur-the Jalayirids in Baghdad and Azerbaijan, the Indus and Muzaffar ds in Shiraz, the Karts in Herat-maintained and sponsored a re-fined and lively literary and artistic production. The artistic milieu that had been created under the Ilkhans and their successors produced splendid examples of the arts of the book, while in literature there appeared the incomparable Persian poet Hafiz of Shiraz.

A CENTURY OF PRINCES - Sources on Timurid History . . .

The geographical and historical meaning of the term “Central Asia” is not as obvious as that of “Asia” or the “Indian subcontinent”, and it requires a definition. Such a definition was given in the introduction to my Bibliography of Islamic Central Asia,1 and, since nothing new has been offered in scholarly literature since then, I will repeat it here in a slightly modified form. In geographical terms, Central Asia extends from the Caspian Sea and the Ural river basin in the west to the Altay mountains and the Turfan oasis in the east, and from the limits of the steppe belt (where it borders the West Siberian forest, the taiga) in the north to the Hindukush and the Kopet-Dagh mountains in the south. But physical geography by itself (even less the contemporary political map of Asia) can hardly define this region, which should instead be approached as a distinct cultural and historical entity. From this standpoint, Central Asia can be defined as the western, Turko-Iranian, part of the Inner Asian heartland; its indigenous population consisted of various Iranian peoples, who have been mostly Turkicized by now, while its growing Turkic population has assimilated its indigenous Iranian culture to various degrees. Beginning with the 8th century A.D., Central Asia was gradually incorporated into the Islamic world (a process that now distinguishes it from the eastern part of the Inner Asian heartland, Mongolia and Tibet). As part of the Islamic world, it shares many cul- tural features with its Islamic neighbors to the south and to the west, but it combines them in a unique blend with the features it shares with the world of the Inner Asian nomads. It belongs to both of these worlds, being a border area for each of them.

AN HISTORICAL ATLAS OF CENTRAL ASIA . . .

© 2024 Mughal Library. All Rights Reserved.

bottom of page